|
« Back to Index
ANXIETY OVER G M FOODS
It is impossible to have a rational debate concerning the safety
of eating genetically modified food, until we observe the fact that
commercial warfare has replaced fair trading.
All is now fair in love, war and business.
Unless we see the truth of that statement we shall not recognise
the difference between propaganda and scientific fact.
With scientists being employed by all sides in the pursuit of victories
in commercial warfare, we observe scientists spinning the truth.
It is there for all of us to see in the matter of MMR, Foot &
Mouth Disease, fish stocks, Gulf War Syndrome, sheep dip, depleted
uranium and the list is endless when you start to look.
This sort of graft and sleaze in subjects which determine the health
of the human race is far more deadly than open military warfare.
We ignore it at our peril.
In order to remain blind to the dangers of commercial warfare,
we must remain blind to its cause.
How and why has fair trading turned into commercial warfare.
We all think it is a result of our greed. But we know it is not
your greed or my greed, but someone else's greed.
Then we say it is the greed of big business. Now we are off the
rails altogether, because greed is a personal attribute of individuals.
Corporations, especially big ones, have no personal attributes
of any description. They do have devised public images as part of
propaganda, which hides all sorts of evils not possessed by individuals.
It may be painful to look at, but we must confront the reason that
competition in commerce has driven out ethics.
"There is no place for ethics in economics" is the datum
taught at the LSE.
Something is horribly wrong with the global economy that such a
philosophy is acceptable in the world today.
We do have a fraudulent monetary system in which money has to be
borrowed into existence. That is a fact which nobody denies.
But the mention of reform to any politician, to any economist or
even to the Governor of the Bank of England will be met with the
response, "Our job is to make the existing system work. We
are not paid to interfere with the status quo."
No one wears the hat of monetary reformer. That hat has not been
worn for 300 years.
|