|
« Back to Index
Letter to: Damian Reece Comment The Daily Telegraph.
London
19th August, 2006
Who pays for security to fly?
Dear Mr Reece.
In your Comment on Friday 18th August, you say that the cost of
security must be paid for by the passengers. But you also say that
security must be taken out of the hands of those who have to make
a profit out of flying. Who, one might ask, provides the money for
that profit, other than the passengers.
Sir Richard Branson calls on the Government to pay for security,
seeming to assume that the Government is other than the tax payer.
Why should those of us who do not fly, subsidise the profits made
from those who do fly?.
Of course if we could see this conundrum straight on, we could
then see that the cost of fighting terrorism could remove the cause
of terrorism.
The cost of the war against terrorism could be more effective than
the fighting.
It goes like this.
Taxes are now so high, that we are forced to borrow the money to
pay our taxes. We accept credit from the banks, launder that credit
and turn it into money, because we cannot pay tax with credit. The
cost of laundering credit, doubles the tax.
Better by far for everyone would be, to have our Government restore
unto itself the sole right to issue new money and deprive the banks
of the right to issue new money as credit.
This would kill the credit laundering industry stone dead. That
would be the end of our ability to enslave the poor with poverty.
Turning the under privileged into slaves, is the cause of terrorism.
Human beings have never ever enjoyed being slaves and will die to
be free.
Those who mobilise that desire to die, are never poverty stricken
themselves and thus we are thrown off the scent.
Doctor Edward C Hamlyn MBChB
|